World CupAustralia -- Egypt18:00World CupArgentina -- Cape Verde Islands22:00World CupColombia -- Ghana01:30World CupCanada -- Morocco17:00World CupParaguay -- France21:00World CupBrazil -- Norway20:00World CupMexico -- England00:00World CupPortugal -- Spain19:00World CupUSA -- Belgium00:00Super LeagueYunnan Yukun 21 Henan JianyeFTWorld CupSwitzerland 20 AlgeriaFTWorld CupPortugal 21 CroatiaFTWorld CupSpain 30 AustriaFTWorld CupUSA 20 Bosnia & HerzegovinaFTWorld CupAustralia -- Egypt18:00World CupArgentina -- Cape Verde Islands22:00World CupColombia -- Ghana01:30World CupCanada -- Morocco17:00World CupParaguay -- France21:00World CupBrazil -- Norway20:00World CupMexico -- England00:00World CupPortugal -- Spain19:00World CupUSA -- Belgium00:00Super LeagueYunnan Yukun 21 Henan JianyeFTWorld CupSwitzerland 20 AlgeriaFTWorld CupPortugal 21 CroatiaFTWorld CupSpain 30 AustriaFTWorld CupUSA 20 Bosnia & HerzegovinaFT
Back to news
Tennis

Doubles players push back over ATP proposals to cut draws and prize share

Leading doubles players have criticised ATP proposals that could reduce doubles draw sizes and prize-money share from 2028, while the tour says it is reviewing the format for long-term sustainability.

Doubles players push back over ATP proposals to cut draws and prize share
Image credit: bbc.co.uk

Leading doubles players are objecting to ATP proposals that could sharply reduce opportunities and prize money in men’s doubles from 2028. The disputed ideas include smaller draws and a lower share of prize money for doubles, though no final policy has been confirmed.

According to the reported proposals discussed at Wimbledon, ATP Masters 1000 doubles draws could fall to 16 teams, while smaller tour events could have only eight. The doubles share of prize money could also drop from about 20% to about 10%, with funds redirected toward singles players.

The players’ argument is that such changes would make the doubles circuit viable only for a narrow elite, particularly harming those outside the top 30. The concern is not only about individual earnings, but also about whether a reduced calendar pathway would discourage specialists from pursuing doubles as a full-time career.

The ATP’s response frames the review as an attempt to build a more sustainable model, including possible investment in early-round singles prize money. That sets up a wider debate for tennis: how to balance commercial interest, player livelihoods and the place of doubles within the professional game.

Sources & copyright

This article does not reproduce any source in full. It is built from public facts and editorial work; original links belong to their authors.

Public sources

This article may use AI for summarization, translation, or SEO assistance, and is reviewed by editors before publishing.

Discussion

    Related reading

    News
    Swiatek and Rybakina move through Wimbledon tests with authority
    Editorial1 min
    News
    BBC Tennis quiz invites fans to identify a mystery star
    Editorial1 min
    News
    Alexandra Eala’s Wimbledon breakthrough puts Philippine tennis in the spotlight
    Editorial1 min
    News
    Arthur Fery becomes Britain’s last singles hope at Wimbledon
    Editorial2 min