World CupEngland -- Congo DR16:00World CupBelgium -- Senegal20:00World CupUSA -- Bosnia & Herzegovina00:00World CupSpain -- Austria19:00World CupPortugal -- Croatia23:00World CupSwitzerland -- Algeria03:00World CupAustralia -- Egypt18:00World CupArgentina -- Cape Verde Islands22:00World CupColombia -- Ghana01:30World CupCanada -- Morocco17:00World CupBrazil -- Norway20:00World CupMexico 20 EcuadorFTWorld CupFrance 30 SwedenFTWorld CupIvory Coast 12 NorwayFTWorld CupEngland -- Congo DR16:00World CupBelgium -- Senegal20:00World CupUSA -- Bosnia & Herzegovina00:00World CupSpain -- Austria19:00World CupPortugal -- Croatia23:00World CupSwitzerland -- Algeria03:00World CupAustralia -- Egypt18:00World CupArgentina -- Cape Verde Islands22:00World CupColombia -- Ghana01:30World CupCanada -- Morocco17:00World CupBrazil -- Norway20:00World CupMexico 20 EcuadorFTWorld CupFrance 30 SwedenFTWorld CupIvory Coast 12 NorwayFT
Back to news
formula1

Piastri questions Gasly penalty reversal after Monaco pit-lane error

Oscar Piastri has criticised the decision to erase Pierre Gasly’s Monaco pit-lane speeding penalty after officials found a measurement discrepancy that affected several drivers.

Piastri questions Gasly penalty reversal after Monaco pit-lane error
Image credit: bbc.co.uk

Oscar Piastri says he is baffled by the decision to overturn Pierre Gasly’s Monaco Grand Prix penalty, after a pit-lane measurement error led to multiple drivers being wrongly penalised. Gasly was restored to third place following Alpine’s review, reshaping the final order after the race.

The stewards’ findings said the pit lane had been measured in a way that made the time-based speed calculation unreliable, meaning drivers were flagged as exceeding the 60km/h limit despite the underlying measurement issue. Gasly, Piastri, George Russell, Lewis Hamilton and Franco Colapinto were among those penalised during the race.

The controversy is sharper because some drivers had already served penalties before Gasly’s was removed. Russell’s race was heavily affected by a drive-through penalty, while Piastri lost ground when he served his sanction; Hamilton’s impact was limited because Ferrari served the penalty under safety-car conditions.

Mercedes, Red Bull and McLaren have indicated they may challenge the Gasly decision, while the FIA has acknowledged a discrepancy and said improvements will follow. The case now raises a wider governance question for Formula 1: if an in-race penalty is later shown to be flawed, how should officials repair the result without creating unfairness for others?

Sources & copyright

This article does not reproduce any source in full. It is built from public facts and editorial work; original links belong to their authors.

Public sources

This article may use AI for summarization, translation, or SEO assistance, and is reviewed by editors before publishing.

Discussion

    Related reading

    News
    Restored Williams FW25 set for competitive return after 23 years
    Editorial1 min
    News
    Chequered Flag episode puts Hamilton’s Ferrari impact in focus
    Editorial1 min
    News
    Hamilton’s Ferrari breakthrough reshapes Barcelona race after late VSC drama
    Editorial1 min
    News
    Russell’s Austrian GP pole raises fresh questions over yellow-flag judgment
    Editorial2 min